Comparison of qPCR and metagenomic sequencing methods for quantifying antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater.

Surveillance methods of circulating antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are of utmost importance in order to tackle what has been described as one of the greatest threats to humanity in the 21st century. In order to be effective, these methods have to be accurate, quickly deployable, and scalable. In this study, we compare metagenomic shotgun sequencing (TruSeq DNA sequencing) of wastewater samples with a state-of-the-art PCR-based method (Resistomap HT-qPCR) on four wastewater samples that were taken from hospital, industrial, urban and rural areas. ARGs that confer resistance to 11 antibiotic classes have been identified in these wastewater samples using both methods, with the most abundant observed classes of ARGs conferring resistance to aminoglycoside, multidrug-resistance (MDR), macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB), tetracycline and beta-lactams. In comparing the methods, we observed a strong correlation of relative abundance of ARGs obtained by the two tested methods for the majority of antibiotic classes. Finally, we investigated the source of discrepancies in the results obtained by the two methods. This analysis revealed that false negatives were more likely to occur in qPCR due to mutated primer target sites, whereas ARGs with incomplete or low coverage were not detected by the sequencing method due to the parameters set in the bioinformatics pipeline. Indeed, despite the good correlation between the methods, each has its advantages and disadvantages which are also discussed here. By using both methods together, a more robust ARG surveillance program can be established. Overall, the work described here can aid wastewater treatment plants that plan on implementing an ARG surveillance program.

Long-term study on wastewater SARS-CoV-2 surveillance across United Arab Emirates.

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) demonstrates an efficient tool to monitor and predict SARS-CoV-2 community distribution. Many countries across the world have adopted the technique, however, most of these studies were conducted for a short duration with a limited sampling size. In this study, long-term reliability and quantification of wastewater SARS-CoV-2 surveillance is reported via analyzing 16,858 samples collected from 453 different locations across the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from May 2020 to June 2022. The collected composite samples were first incubated at 60 °C followed by filtration, concentration, and then RNA extraction using commercially available kits. The extracted RNA was then analyzed by one-step RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR, and the data was compared to the reported clinical cases. The average positivity rate in the wastewater samples was found to be 60.61 % (8.41-96.77 %), however, the positivity rate obtained from the RT-ddPCR was significantly higher than the RT-qPCR suggesting higher sensitivity of RT-ddPCR. Time-lagged correlation analysis indicated an increase in positive cases in the wastewater samples when the clinical positive cases declined suggesting that wastewater data are highly affected by the unreported asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic and recovering individuals. The weekly SARS-CoV-2 viral count in the wastewater samples are positively correlated with the diagnosed new clinical cases throughout the studied period and the studied locations. Viral count in wastewater peaked approximately one to two weeks prior to the peaks appearing in active clinical cases indicating that wastewater viral concentrations are effective in predicting clinical cases. Overall, this study further confirms the long-term sensitivity and robust approach of WBE to detect trends in SARS-CoV-2 spread and helps contribute to pandemic management.